MIDVALE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION BOARD MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY April 24, 2018, 6:45 pm
SEQUOYA LIBRARY
Present: J. Chipault, C. Kreimendahl, G. Poulson, D. Lamb, E. Mackey, T. Jarvis, L. Raihala, R. Rotter, S. Rudman, W. Weber, E. Rogers, G. Fischer, J. Lager
Also present: Jodie Thill, Gretchen Bourg, Carousel Bayrd
1. Chipault called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m.
2. March minutes; motion/second to approve. Motion carried.
3. Treasurer Rotter distributed Financial Report. Funds on hand were $50,862.97. Picnic prices will be about the same as last year per coordinators. Motion/second to allocate $3000 for 2018 picnic budget. Motion carried.
4. Membership drive discussed. Jarvis will get online registration site ready. Lamb will send out last year’s registration form to Board for suggested changes. The Membership Messenger should be done by late May.
5. Some Board members requested new member packets from Chuck for some of their new neighbors. Agreed that the packet would include a coupon for a free MHCA history book given our large book inventory.
6. Van Hise Playground Fund: Thill and Bourg from Van Hise Elementary PTO and Bayrd presented request for $5000 to aid their playground renovation project. Phase Two involves purchase and installation of playground equipment to serve both the elementary and middle schools. So far they have relied mainly on parent donations toward their $50,000 goal. Hill Farms neighborhood association is expected to make a donation. Phase One was labor-intensive layout, access improvement and old equipment removal. Motion/second to donate $2000. Amended motion/second to donate $5000. Discussion followed. Roll call vote: 7 for, 2 against. Motion carried.
7. Legislative reports. Bayrd outlined Dane Co. Board Public Protection/Judiciary Committee activities. Working on criminal justice issues including bail reform guidelines and restorative justice.
8. Announcements:
Lamb updated the Summer Segoe Concert lineup. May possibly secure a Port-a-Potty for $500.
Kreimendahl suggested we request the City to install flashing light beacon for the SW Bike Path-Midvale Blvd crossing. Motion/second to approve request. Motion carried.
Question raised about extra/temporary parking for voting site as the Sequoya lot is often overflowing. Poulson says the City might further encourage early or absentee voting to lessen such problem.
Meeting adjourned by motion at 8:23 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by C. Kreimendahl, Secy.
MINUTES SUPPLEMENT, AS APPROVED BY BOARD ON 6/26/18:
Second, these are the points I recall being made during the course of the discussion on whether, and how much, to give to Van Hise elementary for their playground project:
First: Carousel Bayrd and two other members of the PTO requested $5000. They supported their request with the following arguments:
1) Van Hise needs a new playground. There is a section of this playground where a slide used to be that is currently covered over with a piece of plywood because the slide broke, and the plywood has been there for months. Earlier this year a suspension bridge broke and was covered in yellow tape for some period of time.
2) The Van Hise playground is in such poor condition that the older students and Hamilton students have been requested not to play on it anymore.
3) Van Hise asked the school district for money, but Van Hise is ranked a G school, which means it is one of the lowest-ranked in terms of priority for receiving money from the school district.
4) Van Hise has had fundraisers and has raised significant funds but has been unable to meet its fundraising goal of (I believe?) $100,000.
5) Because Van Hise draws from a pool that has relatively fewer free and reduced lunch/higher income students, it is not eligible for some of the grants that other schools might receive. Midvale, for example, received a $5000 grant from the Rotary Club, and Van Hise wasn't eligible for that grant, or for other similar grants.
6) Van Hise has cut internal programs such as teacher grants,which are funds teachers apply for in order to do specific projects in their classrooms. This past year Van Hise did not give any teacher grants in order to conserve money for the play ground project.
During the discussion, arguments included:
1) Against: We shouldn't give $5000 because we only gave a certain sum ($1000?) to Midvale when it asked for money for a new playground.
Counter: Some of us who were not on the board when we gave Midvale only $1000 didn't know why we gave only $1000 to Midvale when we have over $40,000 in our account and we are a non-profit neighborhood association; the fact that we gave only $1000 to Midvale shouldn't be a reason now for giving only $1000 to Van Hise now.
2) For: The Van Hise playground is located in the Hill Farms neighborhood.
Counter: Half of the Midvale Heights neighborhood children attend Van Hise, and half attend Midvale. Both elementary schools (which are the only two in our neighborhood) have students from outside the neighborhood.
3) Against: The Hill Farms neighborhood association isn't giving $5000.
Counter: The Midvale Heights NA has more money than Hill Farms because Midvale Heights organizes t-ball and that raises a lot of money. The Hill Farms kids play on the Midvale Heights t-ball team because it is the closest t-ball league around. So, the Hill Farm families have contributed to the $20,000 sum raised from t-ball.
4) For: The line item for t-ball (i.e., the money raised by t-ball that was sitting in the Midvale Heights neighborhood association account) was approximately $20,000. That money came from families with kids in elementary school. We are a non-profit organization with the purpose of enriching the neighborhood. We are not a for-profit organization. We raise money to enrich our community. It seems fitting to use the money raised from families with school-aged children to help build a playground for one of the neighborhood's schools.
5) For: We can't spend the money in our neighborhood association on new trees or equipment for city parks. This city has a plan with respect to all of its parks, and the city does not want some parks to be better than others just because some parks happen to be located in neighborhoods that have the ability to make them nicer. The city wants all the city parks to be equally nice. Or nice-ish. Meaning we can't use our money on city parks. So we should spend some of it to help replace the broken and outdated equipment at one of the schools the neighborhood children attend.
I am probably forgetting some arguments for or against. This is what I remember.
-Elizabeth
--
Elizabeth Mackey